Two Scholarships for a Nation: Why Angola Brilliant Minds Risks Excluding the Very Talent It Claims to Empower

on

 A prestigious vision undermined by extreme scarcity, perceived unfairness, and a missed opportunity for national transformation.


A Promise That Excites — and Excludes

The launch of the Angola Brilliant Minds Scholarship, a fully funded pathway to secondary and university education in the United Kingdom, has been promoted with remarkable energy across Angola. On paper, the programme represents excellence: full funding, international exposure, STEM focus, and guaranteed professional placement upon return.

Yet beneath the excitement lies a deeply troubling reality: only two students are selected nationwide each year.

In a country of approximately 36 million people, spread across 21 provinces, this opportunity is not merely competitive — it is exceptionally narrow to the point of being exclusionary. What should be a national beacon of hope instead risks becoming a symbol of inequality, discouragement, and distrust among the very youth it seeks to inspire.



An Unacceptably Limited Reach


Selecting two teenagers from an entire nation is not just restrictive — it is disproportionate. Even when framed as a “prestigious” initiative, the scale raises serious ethical and policy questions:

  • Why mobilize thousands of applicants for a probability that borders on negligible?

  • Why target teenagers nationally when the opportunity realistically benefits only 0.000005% of the population?

  • How does this align with national education and youth development priorities?

Many students have already expressed that they will not even apply, believing the process will mirror other systems they experience daily: high academic performance overshadowed by favoritism, informal payments, and administrative manipulation. Whether or not these fears are substantiated, the perception alone is damaging — and perception matters in public trust.



Risk of Reinforcing Distrust and Inequality


Angola’s education system has long struggled with concerns around fairness and access. Students report experiences where:

  • High grades do not guarantee placement

  • Public education opportunities are allegedly “sold”

  • Merit is often disconnected from outcomes

Introducing a hyper-exclusive scholarship into this context, without broader inclusion mechanisms, risks reinforcing the belief that excellence is reserved for the connected, not the capable.

This is not generosity. This is symbolism without scale.


If Privately Sponsored, Public Responsibility Still Applies


The Angolan government must:

  • Step in as a strategic partner, not a bystander

  • Expand the programme’s reach beyond two beneficiaries

  • Ensure transparency, oversight, and equity in selection

At minimum, such a programme should serve as a pilot, not a final model.


A Missed Opportunity for Partnerships

The programme itself acknowledges a key truth: life and education in the United Kingdom are expensive. Precisely for this reason, Angola should not rely on a single sponsor or pathway.

This is the moment to:

  • Build national partnerships with Angolan universities and industries

  • Establish international partnerships beyond the UK

  • Create tiered scholarships (full, partial, regional, hybrid)

  • Support hundreds, not two, through scalable models

STEM development cannot depend on scarcity. National transformation requires volume, not vanity.



Excellence Should Multiply, Not Isolate


A six-year, fully funded journey for two students is admirable — but hundreds of capable students will be left behind, equally brilliant, equally motivated, equally deserving.

True impact is not measured by how elite an opportunity is, but by how many lives it meaningfully changes.

If Angola Brilliant Minds truly seeks to build a legacy of national growth, then its design must reflect national realities, not just international prestige.


Conclusion

Aligning With the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)


As currently structured, the programme falls short of its transformative potential. To realign with global and national priorities, expansion and reform are essential.

This initiative directly relates to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals:

  • SDG 4 – Quality Education: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education for all

  • SDG 8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth: Prepare a skilled workforce at scale

  • SDG 10 – Reduced Inequalities: Prevent opportunity from becoming privilege

  • SDG 17 – Partnerships for the Goals: Mobilize public–private and international cooperation

Angola does not lack brilliant minds.
It lacks enough doors for them to walk through.

A scholarship meant for a nation should look like a nation, not a lottery for two.


Click here to explore:

https://angolabrilliantminds.com/



Comments

Post a Comment